tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898701313543890712.post5245702105441868795..comments2008-05-01T21:29:54.254-07:00Coffee Snobhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00620074728854238145noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898701313543890712.post-11563198073547746222008-05-01T21:29:00.000-07:002008-05-01T21:29:00.000-07:00Jim, what Wright said was dumb. It has nothing to do with being "black". I see it more as a result of the "TV" baby sitter age. If all a parent does to stimulate a child's thought process is set them before the screen, then what ensues is a child who has to have that type of learning. "Take the tv's away people, it will be ok!"Chermonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06218077048870899949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7898701313543890712.post-61969814632391327382008-04-29T09:26:00.000-07:002008-04-29T09:26:00.000-07:00Persuasive and insightful, my friend.<BR/><BR/>It's really sad that men like Wright choose to glory in "blackness" and certain political beliefs in a way that is so detached from Christ and his glory.<BR/><BR/>I loved your point about the foolishness of making one person the spokesman for an entire category of people. <BR/><BR/>It's truly Orwellian how many who consider themselves "progressive" start their assessment of a person using something as irrelevant as their racial category. What ever happened to the core value of classical liberalism, the individual? Instead we have Wright proclaiming that black children cannot learn in the "analytical" or "logical" style that white children learn in. That's progress?Jimhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05394266388757487163noreply@blogger.com